Separation wall
Page: 1 Of 1
2014-06-10
On 8 June 2014, Adalah filed an appeal on behalf of Arab MK Mohammed Barakeh (Hadash/al-Jabha) to the Tel Aviv District Court against the Magistrate Court's decision to convict him of assaulting a...
The struggle against the Wall within the Israeli legal system has provided perhaps the starkest illustration in recent years of a broader debate that has raged for some time – whether petitioning...
Five years after the Advisory Opinion by the International Court Justice (ICJ) on the legality of the Wall, it is time to assess the legal strategies since employed, offer criticisms and reassess...
An examination of the “law-enforcement” activities of members of the “security forces” (the military or “Tzahal,” the Border Police, the police, and the General Security Services or...
The great importance of the principle ICJ Advisory Opinion on the illegality of the Wall lies not only in its affirmation of the ‘Palestinian side,’ but also in its reinforcement of the crucial...
On 9 July 2004, one year ago, legal history was made as the International Court of Justice (ICJ) issued its Advisory Opinion on the legal consequences of the construction of the Wall in the...
9 days before the publication of the International Court of Justice's (ICJ) Advisory Opinion on the Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT),...
Keynote speech from 2005 study day on "The Experience of Legal Representation of Palestinian Prisoners."
What happened in Far'on and Masha is a clear violation of international law. In particular, it constituted the crime of property destruction.
The connection between “Operation Protective Wall” and the start of the construction of the “Protective Security Wall” – as it was called by Israel – is clear.
